(Huffington Post) The writer of a much-maligned New York Times article about Michael Brown admitted on Monday that he had made a mistake when he described the slain teenager as “no angel.”
Those two words that John Eligon chose, along with a series of of descriptions about Brown’s “dabbling” with drugs, alcohol and rap music, set off a scorching round of criticism for the way the paper had characterized Brown. The Times dug an even deeper hole for itself by writing a concurrent article about Darren Wilson, the man who killed Brown, in which Wilson was described as a “well-mannered, relatively soft-spoken, even bland person.” Many said that the contrast seemed to fit a pattern in which black victims of crime are maligned in the media.
Lawrence O’Donnell’s send up of this article is freaking legendary, people.
holydads liked this
sirhro reblogged this from ethiopienne
highly-exalted reblogged this from coutois
nastyglintinyoureyes reblogged this from king-bvm
in-dee-vidual reblogged this from cocoabutterbabe
in-dee-vidual liked this
venusethereal liked this
startledoctopus reblogged this from downlo